Christian Conservative Christian "Independent"

I'm an evangelical Christian, member of the CPC, but presently & unjustly exiled to wander the political wilderness.
All opinions expressed here are solely my own.

Saturday, August 11, 2007

An open letter to Backseat Blogger

Hey there Backseat Blogger,

I've commented before about some of your posts, and I'd just like to ask that you not paint all of us "Christians" with the same brush. Your obvious hatred of all things "Christian" (and I use the term lightly) is clear, and, in my opinion, misguided.

For example, one of your posts today was a direct attack on the Catholic Church, however, you tarred all of us together, once again. Don't forget, there was that rather nasty little incident in 1517 (some obscure guy named Luther) that began a clear division between various branches of the faith, as well as that other split between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches some centruies earlier. Please ensure that you clarify when you direct such attacks. (of course, one of my highschool English teachers couldn't make that distinction either... then again, she was a post-modernist feminist man-hater, so what do you expect?)

As for the church that cancelled the funeral because the veteran was gay, I don't think that was the right decision... though I do understand the delemna that the church officials were going through, as they would not want to appear to support a lifestyle that they viewed as sinful. (for full disclosure, I'm in a similar situation myself presently, as I am not attending a wedding of someone close to me because I do not want to show support of a sinful decision)

Yes, I am a "Christian"... but what does that really mean? It means I am a follower of the Lord Jesus Christ, a believer in His Name, and one who has turned to Him for the salvation of my soul through His shed and precious redeeming blood... blood that was shed for me (and for you too, should you accept His offer of forgiveness) on the cross of Calvary, some 2000 years ago. (actually, it was 1974 years and a couple months ago, if you want to get technical...) What all that means is that I am someone who reads the Bible and takes what it has to say seriously, and try to live my life in accordance with the principles found within its pages. Do I do it well? Not a chance! And there are a great many of us who struggle with the truths contained within its pages, but are seeking to do what is right in His eyes. Please don't just our Master by our mistakes... judge Him for who He is alone! The Lord Jesus is the loving and merciful God who paid such a great price to restore the broken relationship between Himself and His greatest creation... you and I.

Of course, these truths are something that the evil one Satan hates, so obviously he wants to do everything he can to make people like yourself hate all things related to the Lord Jesus Christ. I'd just like to appeal to you today to think twice before making such broad sweeping accusations, and rejecting all things related to Christ because of a few who claim the Lord's Name, and act in ways that don't honour Him as their Lord and Saviour.

Anyway, I won't be able to respond because I'm headed off into the bush for a week... please try to behave everyone, and I look forward to some positive dialouge next week.

Labels:

17 Comments:

  • At Sat Aug 11, 09:51:00 p.m. EDT, Blogger Luke Coughey said…

    Well said.

     
  • At Sat Aug 11, 10:03:00 p.m. EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Methinks thou doth protest too much.

     
  • At Sat Aug 11, 10:05:00 p.m. EDT, Blogger Dirk said…

    I see the point that the backseat blogger is trying to make. The idea that a war vet's funeral be canceled because of his sexual orientation is repugnant. A funeral commemorates someone's life -- it's not like it will have any impact on his afterlife.

    The question I've got here is how are some sins worse than others -- at least in the sense that a church would cancel a guy's funeral? Theologically speaking, any sin constitutes separation from God. So did this church assume this guy was sinless before canceling his funeral?

    Not that it's my business, but I'm having trouble understanding how a wedding would represent something that a Christian would not attend in order to not "show support of a sinful decision".

     
  • At Sat Aug 11, 10:14:00 p.m. EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Your posting was well said. But really why bother?

    After visiting his blog a couple of times through the Blogging tories link all I saw was a repugnant little smart ass who gets off printing his personal hatred and bitterness on the 'net. It's his tiny claim to fame so why feed it?

    A while back he posted a horrible little video off YOUTUBE about some jerk who terrified a little kid to tears with an incredibly cruel computer trick. A couple of posters wrote in with angry comments. He backpedaled saying that he only posted it to show the person's cruelty.

    Yet if this was true why would he post it under the subject heading "FUNNY", which is what it was under?

    Don't respond to this little dickless. He's not worth the time.

    He hates Christians because they believe there are limits to the way humans should be allowed to behave and spoiled little pissants like him don't like their behavior being limited.
    I like your blog and I admire your dedication to your faith. You show a depth of character that this loser is incapable of.

     
  • At Sat Aug 11, 10:38:00 p.m. EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Dirk, I also see the point B.Blogger was trying to make. For what it's worth I disagree with the church's decision on the funeral. Funerals are mostly to comfort the living and this was a very bad call on the part of this church.

    But B. Bloggers hatred of Christians is well documented in his own blog. He is one of the "new style" of tolerant people. Who are tolerant of certain chosen & favoured groups only.

    The thought that not all Christians might agree with a decision made by a small group escapes him.

    It also escapes him that maybe our ever "reliable" news media might have left out some facts in the story that might have led to the church's unfortunate decision.

    B. Blogger willcherry pick only those news stories that portray Christians negatively.

    He hates Christians. So what? Ignore him.

     
  • At Sat Aug 11, 11:28:00 p.m. EDT, Blogger Christian Conservative said…

    John, Christ ignored no one... He always reached (or reaches, present tense) out to everyone.

    Dirk, our modern day "Christianity" has become really soft on the concept of obedience to the Word of God... we (and a whole lot of people who know this individual) are choosing to not attend an individual's wedding because the person is openly defying several clearly taught commandments from the Word of God by marrying the person they are marrying. Many people have Biblically confronted them, and the individual is refusing to walk in obedience to Christ... and as a result, many have chosen not to participate in what they see as a sinful act.

    There's a lot of details I'm not at liberty to share, so it will be difficult to help you out here... I was just refering to it as an example of having to make a tough choice. ;-)

     
  • At Sun Aug 12, 12:06:00 a.m. EDT, Blogger Dirk said…

    John:
    I agree with you and CC about backseat blogger. He's more than happy to rant about how all Christians are hateful, prejudiced, and intolerant, while not seeing the irony of his position.

    Discourse like what's on bb's site is hateful, and in my view amounts to religious intolerance, or even discrimination. While I don't agree with the bit about the funeral, I like that CC is calling bb out.

     
  • At Sun Aug 12, 01:34:00 a.m. EDT, Blogger Unknown said…

    He is juvenile. Just ignore him.

     
  • At Sun Aug 12, 05:29:00 a.m. EDT, Blogger Red Tory said…

    Seeing as you're big on the Word of God, better stay away from the Red Lobster in future. Just a word to the wise... He frowns on the shellfish eating you know, being an abomination (Lev 11:10) and all.

     
  • At Sun Aug 12, 06:08:00 a.m. EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Backseat Blogger posts gay pornography on his blog.

    Recently he posted a youtube video of what appeared to be two 14 year old boys lip synching a song. He referred to them as cute "twinks", twink being the gay word for underage male.

    Imagine if a nongay Blogging Tory posted videos of 14 year old girls on his blog and drooled at how sexy they were...he'd be the most widely loathed blogger in Canada!

    The double standard is appalling and it severely condemns the judgement of Stephen Taylor for allowing gay pornography and - there's no polite word for this - pedophilia on the Blogging Tories aggregator, to say nothing of the extreme anti-Christian hatred that Backseat Blogger engages in.

    CC I would have left this comment at Tayor's but he moderates comments and comments that are critical of him dont see the light of day.

     
  • At Sun Aug 12, 08:38:00 a.m. EDT, Blogger Drew Costen said…

    we (and a whole lot of people who know this individual) are choosing to not attend an individual's wedding because the person is openly defying several clearly taught commandments from the Word of God by marrying the person they are marrying. Many people have Biblically confronted them, and the individual is refusing to walk in obedience to Christ... and as a result, many have chosen not to participate in what they see as a sinful act.

    You don't attend a wedding (or host a funeral) to support what you think is a sinful act, you do it because the person is someone you care about. I'm sure this acquaintance (I don't say friend because a real friend wouldn't avoid a wedding just because of "sin") understands how you feel by this point so now what you do is go to the wedding regardless of your religious views in order to show support of this person, even if you don't support his actions.

    This is why I consider religion to be negative, because it tries to get us to put doctrine and rules before people. In fact this is what drove me away from "traditional" Christianity about a decade ago. I couldn't live with the bigotry, the fear and the inconsistency inherent in the religion. My understanding of Jesus now is that He came to end religion, not create a new one (certainly not the orthodox understanding, I realize, but then I am a heretic).

     
  • At Sun Aug 12, 10:54:00 a.m. EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Sad thing is that most Christians talk alot, but really don't follow Christ's teachings like tolerance, love, etc. Therefore, they are phony hypocrites.

    Also, Christ believed in the separation of church and state and believe one should pray alone. In other words, one should not be making themselves wealthy in "business" of religion which most evangelical leaders are doing and this is disgusting.

    Spewing Bible passages while asking people to send in their truth dollars and living in luxury.

    Your relationship with God and Christ is "one on one" - no middle man getting rich is required

     
  • At Sun Aug 12, 11:35:00 a.m. EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Thanks for your input Backseat Blogger. (oops I mean - shh - "anonymous").

     
  • At Mon Aug 13, 11:19:00 a.m. EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    hehehe.

    i have no idea who anonymous(or is that anonymi??) is/are.

    The one anonymous who accuses me of child pornography(with my posting of a lipsynching youtube) is so over the top as to be laughable.

    and as to the other anonymous who accuses me of being dickless....
    for the record i have a dick, the functioning of which i've never heard any complaints.. lots of groans but no complaints.

    I'd love to know where he got his definition of twink from(he sounds so authoritative!)

    From urbandictionary.com(http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=twink)
    An attractive, boyish-looking, young gay man. The stereotypical twink is 18-22, slender with little or no body hair, often blonde, dresses in club wear even at 10:00 AM, and is not particularly intelligent. A twink is the gay answer to the blonde bimbo cheerleader.

     
  • At Mon Aug 13, 12:28:00 p.m. EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Being gay is NOT a lifestyle.
    It's just something people are or are not.
    H.

     
  • At Tue Aug 14, 12:40:00 a.m. EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Abandon all hope, anonymous just said that we are, by birth incapable of controlling our urges.

    Back on topic:
    A church is not obliged to hold any funerals, weddings or child dedications for that matter. However it does make a church look a bit foolish to make a big show celebrating the passing the death of someone who would not pass through its doors while living. I can't help think of the funeral of PET.

    I offer condolences to the grieving but think it a bit much to put the church into such a difficult position.

    On a more personal note when my father in law passed we continued with his stance on the "church". He wouldn't go to church while living so we did not take him to church after he passed. He was a decorated WWII vet and was known as a bit of skirt chaser. We decided not to impose on any church and simply had his remains cremated and had a family gathering several weeks later at which he was rarely even mentioned.

     
  • At Thu Aug 30, 11:27:00 p.m. EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    The church did not cancel the vetran's ceremony. It refused, based on its Christian principles, to allow the funeral to be a pro-gay ceremony.

    This was covered by several US bloggers who clearly indicated that the congregation when confronted with hwat they belived was a conflict with their beliefs did what thei conscience said they must: Refuse to condone or participate.

    This is their right.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home